Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19461 - 19470 of 27380 for ad.

State v. William A. Spring
the request of a law enforcement officer.” (Emphasis added.) Subsection (5)(b) of the statute provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10157 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
“as a separate trust.” The complete directive, however, reads “as a separate trust as follows” (emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36786 - 2005-06-16

State v. Albert L. Black
it requires adding language to the statute that is not there. ¶10 We conclude that Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26169 - 2006-08-09

COURT OF APPEALS
urgency for prompt action.”) (citation omitted, emphasis added). ¶19 Under the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31892 - 2008-02-20

Langlade County v. Jessi A.
these determinations. (Emphasis added.) ¶7 This court will not set aside the judgment or grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4288 - 2005-03-31

County of Dodge v. Michael J.K.
] (Emphasis added.) Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11222 - 2011-10-12

COURT OF APPEALS
added). Pablo admitted his guilt to the charge under Wis. Stat. § 940.45, which is the aggravated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35641 - 2006-11-21

State v. Jon M. Schirmang
. (Emphasis added.) However, effective April 30, 1994, potential OMVWI penalties include equipping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11108 - 2010-02-17

KML Development Corporation v. Clyde Schreiber
on the second day after mailing. Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP 134.06(2)(b)1 (emphasis added). ¶15 While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3947 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
annexed that the party applying therefor is prohibited from prosecuting the same.” (Emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61892 - 2011-03-28