Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19461 - 19470 of 98424 for court records search online.
Search results 19461 - 19470 of 98424 for court records search online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 16, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258059 - 2020-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 16, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258059 - 2020-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing, we presume it would show that the trial court confirmed his understanding on the record. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142822 - 2015-06-09
hearing, we presume it would show that the trial court confirmed his understanding on the record. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142822 - 2015-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
that the record at that point was not sufficient to raise a real issue about Dorman’s competency. The court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119821 - 2014-08-20
that the record at that point was not sufficient to raise a real issue about Dorman’s competency. The court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119821 - 2014-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31637 - 2008-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31637 - 2008-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
recommendation on the record before accepting Phillips’s plea; and (4) failing to advise Phillips that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35190 - 2009-01-14
recommendation on the record before accepting Phillips’s plea; and (4) failing to advise Phillips that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35190 - 2009-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 3, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46317 - 2010-02-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 3, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46317 - 2010-02-02
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 20, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108226 - 2014-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 20, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108226 - 2014-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of a complete record, we will assume “that every fact essential to sustain the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31768 - 2008-02-11
of a complete record, we will assume “that every fact essential to sustain the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31768 - 2008-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
is supported by the record. See id. Accordingly, we must assume the record supports the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106856 - 2014-01-21
is supported by the record. See id. Accordingly, we must assume the record supports the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106856 - 2014-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1979) (“The rule is well established that reviewing courts are limited to the record, and are bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63280 - 2011-05-02
. 1979) (“The rule is well established that reviewing courts are limited to the record, and are bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63280 - 2011-05-02