Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19461 - 19470 of 76619 for see.

[PDF] State v. Johnnie Carprue
. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-2781-CR Cir. Ct. No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5787 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Brief per CTO of 10-14-2021 (Citizen Mathematicians)
, 26 (1975); see Connor v. Finch, 431 U.S. 407, 414 (1977) (“a court will be held to stricter
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefctocitizenmath.pdf - 2021-10-25

[PDF] Response Brief (BLOC)
1 See, e.g., Evers Br. at 5-8; Hunter Br. at 18-32; Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists Br. at 4
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefbloc.pdf - 2021-11-01

[PDF] 2023AP001412 - 10-06-2023 Order of J Protasiewicz re Motion to Recuse
to intervene and has asked me to recuse.3 1 See Wis. Stat. § 757.02(1) (2021-22
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1412_0822order.pdf - 2023-10-16

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - 10-06-2023 Order of J Protasiewicz re Motion to Recuse
1 See Wis. Stat. § 757.02(1) (2021-22) (setting forth the oath of office for judges and justices
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0822order.pdf - 2023-10-16

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - 10-06-2023 Order of J Protasiewicz re Motion to Recuse
1 See Wis. Stat. § 757.02(1) (2021-22) (setting forth the oath of office for judges and justices
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1006protasiewiczorder.pdf - 2023-11-07

State v. Shawn D. Schulpius
an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62. Appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5175 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Shawn D. Schulpius
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5175 - 2017-09-19

Frontsheet
were searchable as long as the arrestee was at the scene. See Gant, 129 S. Ct. at 1718 ("[O]ur opinion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52200 - 2010-07-14

[PDF] WI 84
of 4 On the issue of the required unanimity in a jury verdict (see supra note 3), the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52200 - 2014-09-15