Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19461 - 19470 of 58508 for speedy trial.

State v. James Podlewski
months. Section 346.65(2)(b). The trial court sentenced Podlewski to a ninety-day period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13719 - 2005-03-31

State v. Todd D. Moskonas
the postconviction court correctly concluded, as a matter of law, that the trial court was empowered to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10768 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Stephen J. Don Carlos v. Susan A. Don Carlos
of a judgment awarding Susan Don Carlos indefinite maintenance of $15,600 per year.1 He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9816 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Donald F. Greeno
and two additional drug-related charges were dismissed. The trial court Nos. 95-0800-CR-NM 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8811 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Shannon G. Poirier v. Paula M. Poirier
the support obligation.1 Because the trial court properly exercised its discretion, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11128 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Rhonda L. Ziegler
claims error in the trial court's admission of an Intoxilyzer test result without expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10764 - 2017-09-20

State v. Walter J. Griffin
issue is whether the trial court erred in its determination that the State did not breach a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-04-25

[PDF] Barbara J. Koehler v. Zurich Insurance Company
the defendants was not supported by credible evidence and that a new trial should be ordered in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10897 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Merrick's Inc. v. Michael Seubert
and the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by refusing to set it aside. We therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12838 - 2017-09-21

State v. David S. Frederick
. The trial court concluded that Frederick’s motion was barred under State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 186 Wis.2d 169
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11535 - 2005-03-31