Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19471 - 19480 of 30191 for de.
Search results 19471 - 19480 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Richard W. Foelker
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Stary, 187 Wis.2d 266, 269, 522 N.W.2d 32, 34 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9540 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Stary, 187 Wis.2d 266, 269, 522 N.W.2d 32, 34 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9540 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 128, 449 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20174 - 2014-09-15
constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 128, 449 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20174 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
findings is reviewed de novo. See id., 2008 WI App 166, ¶9, 314 Wis. 2d at 668, 762 N.W.2d at 388–389
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127139 - 2014-11-11
findings is reviewed de novo. See id., 2008 WI App 166, ¶9, 314 Wis. 2d at 668, 762 N.W.2d at 388–389
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127139 - 2014-11-11
State v. Bobbie K.
), is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Sheboygan County Dep’t of Social Servs. v. Matthew S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25597 - 2006-06-19
), is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Sheboygan County Dep’t of Social Servs. v. Matthew S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25597 - 2006-06-19
COURT OF APPEALS
We consider de novo whether a defendant has been denied his due process right to be sentenced upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50110 - 2010-05-18
We consider de novo whether a defendant has been denied his due process right to be sentenced upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50110 - 2010-05-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The operative statute there called for de novo review by the trial court. Soo Line commenced an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98639 - 2014-09-15
. The operative statute there called for de novo review by the trial court. Soo Line commenced an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98639 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jermaine V. Dantzler
(Ct. App. 1988). This is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 146 Wis. 2d at 54, 429
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4044 - 2017-09-20
(Ct. App. 1988). This is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 146 Wis. 2d at 54, 429
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4044 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Tulley, 2001 WI App 236, ¶5, 248 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101743 - 2013-09-09
was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Tulley, 2001 WI App 236, ¶5, 248 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101743 - 2013-09-09
Victoria Black v. Metro Title, Inc.
relied upon by the trial court. Since this is de novo review, we do not have to discuss our reasons why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21394 - 2006-03-22
relied upon by the trial court. Since this is de novo review, we do not have to discuss our reasons why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21394 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
was insufficient. The sufficiency of a complaint is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Jensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49227 - 2014-09-15
was insufficient. The sufficiency of a complaint is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Jensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49227 - 2014-09-15