Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19481 - 19490 of 30191 for de.
Search results 19481 - 19490 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Rodrigo Rodriguez
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶12 Two alibi witnesses testified at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6893 - 2017-09-20
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶12 Two alibi witnesses testified at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6893 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Frank James Burt, Jr.
Burt’s double jeopardy protections have been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15489 - 2017-09-21
Burt’s double jeopardy protections have been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15489 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bernard E. Burgess
whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1,8, 434 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31
whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1,8, 434 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael Strutz
and is reviewed de novo. Id. Under the procedure the supreme court established in State v. Bangert, 131 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14593 - 2017-09-21
and is reviewed de novo. Id. Under the procedure the supreme court established in State v. Bangert, 131 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14593 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Norman R.
we review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard, Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5323 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard, Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5323 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
was excessive. We review this question de novo. Trinity Evangelical, 261 Wis. 2d 333, ¶48. “An award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36412 - 2014-09-15
was excessive. We review this question de novo. Trinity Evangelical, 261 Wis. 2d 333, ¶48. “An award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36412 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that this court reviews de novo while benefitting from” the circuit court’s analysis. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990236 - 2025-07-29
of law that this court reviews de novo while benefitting from” the circuit court’s analysis. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990236 - 2025-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
is not bound by the trial court’s conclusions, and reviews the matter de novo. See id. at 112. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74375 - 2011-12-11
is not bound by the trial court’s conclusions, and reviews the matter de novo. See id. at 112. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74375 - 2011-12-11
[PDF]
WI 136
will be affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58034 - 2014-09-15
will be affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58034 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mark Capistrant v. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Inc.
Wis. 2d 599, 607, 547 N.W.2d 578, 580–581 (1996). We interpret and apply the applicable statutes de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6016 - 2017-09-19
Wis. 2d 599, 607, 547 N.W.2d 578, 580–581 (1996). We interpret and apply the applicable statutes de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6016 - 2017-09-19