Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19481 - 19490 of 63981 for records/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was revoked in February 2007; the record does not indicate why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76949 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and independently reviewed the record, and conclude that further appellate proceedings would lack arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203545 - 2017-11-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the no-merit report and has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344979 - 2021-03-11

State v. Karl Julius James
find in the record no evidence of a conflict of interest. C. Prosecutor's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7891 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of medical assistance funds. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315579 - 2020-12-22

COURT OF APPEALS
in not objecting to Buechler’s testimony. The record supports that finding. ¶7 At the hearing on Bahr’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130721 - 2014-12-02

COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s: past record of criminal offenses; history of undesirable behavior patterns; personality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37585 - 2009-07-14

[PDF] Charlotte Gadzinski v. Gerald Gadzinski
upon facts appearing in the record, in reliance on appropriate law and is the product of a rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8447 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” in 1981 barred her from working as a caregiver pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 48.685(5)(br)[]5[]. No records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104788 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
properly exercised its sentencing discretion. Upon reviewing the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757216 - 2024-01-30