Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 82271 for case code.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The County’s case consisted of the testimony of Darrin Schwanke, the County’s code enforcement officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132800 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Mark R. Kuhn
to obey the provisions of the Home Improvement Trade Practices Code, WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 110
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9692 - 2017-09-19

Park Manor Limited v. Department of Health and Family Services
, Stats., and Wis. Adm. Code § HFS 132.51(2)(c). The trial court reversed, deciding the division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14138 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
Code are to the Nov. 2006 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2006AP1964-FT 3 In April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27873 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
at his expense. Wisconsin Admin. Code § DOC 309.20(4) requires that each prison facility adopt policies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35531 - 2010-03-11

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
affirmed the Department’s decision. Berg now appeals. ¶5 Even though this case is before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27873 - 2007-01-22

[PDF] Jane A. Beard v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.
superior and that, under the facts and circumstances of the case, Beard could not bring a cause of action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11754 - 2017-09-20

Jane A. Beard v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.
of respondeat superior and that, under the facts and circumstances of the case, Beard could not bring a cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11754 - 2005-03-31

Brown County v. April O.
pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 48.315(2), under the undisputed facts of this case, presents a legal question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3420 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Brown County v. April O.
facts of this case, presents a legal question of statutory interpretation. Jason B. v. State, 176 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3419 - 2017-09-19