Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 3970 for davie.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 3970 for davie.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument, claims of error are forfeited. See Davis v. State, 61 Wis. 2d 284, 287, 212 N.W.2d 139 (1973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162157 - 2017-09-21
argument, claims of error are forfeited. See Davis v. State, 61 Wis. 2d 284, 287, 212 N.W.2d 139 (1973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162157 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph M. Rucker
not be used for impeachment. The trial court was wrong. See Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 319-20 (1974).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10993 - 2005-03-31
not be used for impeachment. The trial court was wrong. See Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 319-20 (1974).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10993 - 2005-03-31
Legend Diamonds, Inc. v. Diamond Cutters of Milwaukee
. mac davis, Judge. Affirmed. Before Nettesheim, P.J., Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4511 - 2005-03-31
. mac davis, Judge. Affirmed. Before Nettesheim, P.J., Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4511 - 2005-03-31
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
02-05-2015 Affirmed 2013AP002221 State ex rel. Glenn M. Davis v. State of Wisconsin1
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139714 - 2015-04-09
02-05-2015 Affirmed 2013AP002221 State ex rel. Glenn M. Davis v. State of Wisconsin1
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139714 - 2015-04-09
[PDF]
Kimberly Area School District v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of Mark F. Yokom of Davis & Kuelthau, S.C. of Oshkosh. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20262 - 2017-09-21
of Mark F. Yokom of Davis & Kuelthau, S.C. of Oshkosh. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20262 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Patrick Martin
from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16029 - 2017-09-21
from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16029 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, P.J. Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court of this state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369229 - 2021-05-26
, P.J. Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court of this state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369229 - 2021-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229, 236-37 (2011). However, the good faith exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250474 - 2019-11-21
. See Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229, 236-37 (2011). However, the good faith exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250474 - 2019-11-21
Kimberly Area School District v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
F. Yokom of Davis & Kuelthau, S.C. of Oshkosh. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20262 - 2006-01-09
F. Yokom of Davis & Kuelthau, S.C. of Oshkosh. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20262 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
Bret L. May v. Timothy A. Bonngard
reasonably exercised its discretion. State v. Davis, 2001 WI 136, ¶28, 248 Wis. 2d 986, 637 N.W.2d 62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20994 - 2017-09-21
reasonably exercised its discretion. State v. Davis, 2001 WI 136, ¶28, 248 Wis. 2d 986, 637 N.W.2d 62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20994 - 2017-09-21