Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 68275 for did.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 68275 for did.
State v. David Buck
did not convince Buck to accept the State’s plea agreement and because his counsel was not licensed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15453 - 2005-03-31
did not convince Buck to accept the State’s plea agreement and because his counsel was not licensed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15453 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing were “deficient and did not allow Morgan to understand the charges to which he pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562918 - 2022-09-09
hearing were “deficient and did not allow Morgan to understand the charges to which he pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562918 - 2022-09-09
[PDF]
State v. Robert C. Braun
in instructing the jury. Because the trial court did not err, this court affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12045 - 2017-09-21
in instructing the jury. Because the trial court did not err, this court affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12045 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
he pled; (3) he did not understand the maximum potential penalty he faced due to incorrect advice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117566 - 2017-09-21
he pled; (3) he did not understand the maximum potential penalty he faced due to incorrect advice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117566 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues: (1) the Commission’s decision was arbitrary; (2) the circuit court erred because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234526 - 2019-02-12
argues: (1) the Commission’s decision was arbitrary; (2) the circuit court erred because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234526 - 2019-02-12
[PDF]
State v. Mai Lee Vue
, however, did not request a different interpreter for witnesses, and did not object when the court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8797 - 2017-09-19
, however, did not request a different interpreter for witnesses, and did not object when the court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8797 - 2017-09-19
Edward Pryzina v. City of Thorp
did not receive due notice of the board’s hearing; the evidence did not reasonably allow the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10079 - 2005-03-31
did not receive due notice of the board’s hearing; the evidence did not reasonably allow the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10079 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of, the meaning of “utter disregard,” an element of one of the charges to which he pled; (3) he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117566 - 2014-07-21
of, the meaning of “utter disregard,” an element of one of the charges to which he pled; (3) he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117566 - 2014-07-21
[PDF]
State v. Mai Lee Vue
, however, did not request a different interpreter for witnesses, and did not object when the court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8798 - 2017-09-19
, however, did not request a different interpreter for witnesses, and did not object when the court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8798 - 2017-09-19
First National Bank of Stoughton v. Wayne L. Aaberg, Jr.
. The Aabergs made payments in November and January, but did not make a payment in December. Also in December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12208 - 2005-03-31
. The Aabergs made payments in November and January, but did not make a payment in December. Also in December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12208 - 2005-03-31