Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 15413 for fee.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 15413 for fee.
[PDF]
David A.C. v. Veronica L.D.
of attorney fees under WIS. STAT. § 802.05 (1997-98)1 and arises in the context of a dispute between David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15895 - 2017-09-21
of attorney fees under WIS. STAT. § 802.05 (1997-98)1 and arises in the context of a dispute between David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15895 - 2017-09-21
David A.C. v. Veronica L.D.
concerns an award of attorney fees under Wis. Stat. § 802.05 (1997-98)[1] and arises in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15895 - 2005-03-31
concerns an award of attorney fees under Wis. Stat. § 802.05 (1997-98)[1] and arises in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15895 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wisconsin Gifts, Inc. v. City of Oak Creek
. § 7.203(4)-(9). This included a $1600 licensing fee for new applications for adult entertainment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24522 - 2017-09-21
. § 7.203(4)-(9). This included a $1600 licensing fee for new applications for adult entertainment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24522 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Gifts, Inc. v. City of Oak Creek
). This included a $1600 licensing fee for new applications for adult entertainment businesses (with a $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24522 - 2006-03-20
). This included a $1600 licensing fee for new applications for adult entertainment businesses (with a $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24522 - 2006-03-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Griswold to pay $25.00 monthly to Dane County for reimbursement of guardian ad litem (GAL) fees incurred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184005 - 2017-09-21
Griswold to pay $25.00 monthly to Dane County for reimbursement of guardian ad litem (GAL) fees incurred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184005 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court failed to adequately explain its decision to award Jane Bodart attorney fees for certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193784 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court failed to adequately explain its decision to award Jane Bodart attorney fees for certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193784 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
orders, and requiring him to pay $2406.50 in attorney’s fees incurred by Paula Nelson-Hooker in pursuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90737 - 2012-12-17
orders, and requiring him to pay $2406.50 in attorney’s fees incurred by Paula Nelson-Hooker in pursuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90737 - 2012-12-17
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. The terms of the note included a "success fee" to the firm of one-third of the net proceeds from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219027 - 2018-11-20
. The terms of the note included a "success fee" to the firm of one-third of the net proceeds from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219027 - 2018-11-20
Michael R. Wolfe v. Nathen Saloch
$ 45.00 (2) Cleaning fees as per contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9719 - 2005-03-31
$ 45.00 (2) Cleaning fees as per contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9719 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and awarding actual attorney fees and costs in favor of the Wetzels. Belcorp argues the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110111 - 2014-04-14
, and awarding actual attorney fees and costs in favor of the Wetzels. Belcorp argues the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110111 - 2014-04-14