Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 68874 for he.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 68874 for he.
[PDF]
WI 106
-day suspension of his license to practice law in Wisconsin and that he bear the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45182 - 2014-09-15
-day suspension of his license to practice law in Wisconsin and that he bear the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45182 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the ground that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel when trial counsel failed to alert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189749 - 2017-09-21
on the ground that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel when trial counsel failed to alert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189749 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. 1 Campos argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas—which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191476 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief. 1 Campos argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas—which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191476 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the charges to which he was pleading; was not currently receiving treatment for a mental illness or disorder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133742 - 2015-01-26
the charges to which he was pleading; was not currently receiving treatment for a mental illness or disorder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133742 - 2015-01-26
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a) (2005-06).[2] He also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion. Sundermeyer argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36152 - 2009-04-13
)(a) (2005-06).[2] He also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion. Sundermeyer argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36152 - 2009-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06 (2011-12).[1] He also appeals an order that denied his motion to reconsider. He alleges that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109089 - 2014-03-23
. § 974.06 (2011-12).[1] He also appeals an order that denied his motion to reconsider. He alleges that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109089 - 2014-03-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Huff is entitled to the nine additional days of sentence credit that he seeks, and we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85492 - 2014-09-15
that Huff is entitled to the nine additional days of sentence credit that he seeks, and we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85492 - 2014-09-15
Hector Cubero v. Dan Buchler
in an unassigned area. He alleges numerous procedural and substantive errors in the proceeding. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8239 - 2005-03-31
in an unassigned area. He alleges numerous procedural and substantive errors in the proceeding. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8239 - 2005-03-31
Micheal Locklear v. Jon Litscher
in December 2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5213 - 2005-03-31
in December 2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5213 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Micheal Locklear v. Jon Litscher
2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5213 - 2017-09-19
2000. The named respondent was Secretary of Corrections Jon Litscher. Locklear alleged that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5213 - 2017-09-19