Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 17105 for probate/1000.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 17105 for probate/1000.
State v. Eugene Thomas
and drug paraphernalia. The evidence which resulted in the conviction was seized during a probation search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12142 - 2005-03-31
and drug paraphernalia. The evidence which resulted in the conviction was seized during a probation search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12142 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
an order extending his term of probation. Cochran argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48823 - 2014-09-15
an order extending his term of probation. Cochran argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48823 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
extending his term of probation. Cochran argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48823 - 2010-04-07
extending his term of probation. Cochran argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48823 - 2010-04-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
, pro se, a circuit-court order affirming on certiorari review the revocation of his probation. Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31046 - 2014-09-15
, pro se, a circuit-court order affirming on certiorari review the revocation of his probation. Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31046 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
probation. Brown claims that: (1) the Division of Hearings and Appeals did not have jurisdiction to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31046 - 2007-12-03
probation. Brown claims that: (1) the Division of Hearings and Appeals did not have jurisdiction to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31046 - 2007-12-03
[PDF]
WI APP 102
supervision based on conduct that occurred during his probation period. McElvaney asserts that his term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32888 - 2014-09-15
supervision based on conduct that occurred during his probation period. McElvaney asserts that his term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32888 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
improperly revoked his extended supervision based on conduct that occurred during his probation period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32888 - 2008-07-29
improperly revoked his extended supervision based on conduct that occurred during his probation period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32888 - 2008-07-29
[PDF]
Lee A. Knowlin v. David H. Schwarz
dismissing his petition for a writ of certiorari challenging his probation revocation. We affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3600 - 2017-09-19
dismissing his petition for a writ of certiorari challenging his probation revocation. We affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3600 - 2017-09-19
Dwayne G. Thomas v. David M. Schwarz
probation. Thomas’s probation was revoked based on his violation of the terms of his probation while he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18649 - 2005-06-21
probation. Thomas’s probation was revoked based on his violation of the terms of his probation while he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18649 - 2005-06-21
Lee A. Knowlin v. David H. Schwarz
of certiorari challenging his probation revocation. We affirm the order. ¶2 Knowlin was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3600 - 2005-03-31
of certiorari challenging his probation revocation. We affirm the order. ¶2 Knowlin was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3600 - 2005-03-31