Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 59782 for quit claim deed.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 59782 for quit claim deed.
Mary Jane Lenhardt v. Paul W. Lenhardt
. In her complaint, she claimed that Paul bought the lot as her agent with the agreement that he would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15820 - 2005-03-31
. In her complaint, she claimed that Paul bought the lot as her agent with the agreement that he would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15820 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Charles R. and Marybelle Bentley v. City of Madison
dismissing their claims of title to the land encompassed by the platted courts. Section 80.32(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14569 - 2017-09-21
dismissing their claims of title to the land encompassed by the platted courts. Section 80.32(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14569 - 2017-09-21
Charles R. and Marybelle Bentley v. City of Madison
of Madison.[1] They appeal a judgment dismissing their claims of title to the land encompassed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14569 - 2005-03-31
of Madison.[1] They appeal a judgment dismissing their claims of title to the land encompassed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14569 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Penny P. Skaife
of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred in granting Skaife’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14981 - 2017-09-21
of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred in granting Skaife’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14981 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
first claims that he did not waive an objection to the State’s motion to preclude him from testifying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301796 - 2020-11-04
first claims that he did not waive an objection to the State’s motion to preclude him from testifying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301796 - 2020-11-04
State v. Penny P. Skaife
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14981 - 2005-03-31
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14981 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas Maug
)(a), Stats. In fact, Maug pled "no contest" to the charge. Maug does not claim that the trial court abused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7896 - 2005-03-31
)(a), Stats. In fact, Maug pled "no contest" to the charge. Maug does not claim that the trial court abused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7896 - 2005-03-31
State v. Artie L. Terrell
of a controlled substance (cocaine base), contrary to §§ 161.14(7)(a) and 161.41(3m), Stats. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10851 - 2005-03-31
of a controlled substance (cocaine base), contrary to §§ 161.14(7)(a) and 161.41(3m), Stats. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10851 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Artie L. Terrell
of a controlled substance (cocaine base), contrary to §§ 161.14(7)(a) and 161.41(3m), STATS. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10851 - 2017-09-20
of a controlled substance (cocaine base), contrary to §§ 161.14(7)(a) and 161.41(3m), STATS. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10851 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Maug
pled "no contest" to the charge. Maug does not claim that the trial court abused its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7896 - 2017-09-19
pled "no contest" to the charge. Maug does not claim that the trial court abused its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7896 - 2017-09-19