Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 20373 for sai.
Search results 1951 - 1960 of 20373 for sai.
Frontsheet
that sentenced them four, or five, or six, seven years and say, here, see what happened to me. I'm a good person
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112977 - 2014-05-22
that sentenced them four, or five, or six, seven years and say, here, see what happened to me. I'm a good person
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112977 - 2014-05-22
[PDF]
State v. Van G. Norwood
. [Norwood] says I’m willing to plead out to a Class B felony.” The court declined to rule on the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19687 - 2017-09-21
. [Norwood] says I’m willing to plead out to a Class B felony.” The court declined to rule on the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19687 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of one of the detectives’ testimony. Putman did not say anything to trial counsel because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238249 - 2019-03-28
of one of the detectives’ testimony. Putman did not say anything to trial counsel because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238249 - 2019-03-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a guilty plea? Did he ever say if we had this information, I’m not going to enter a guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141858 - 2017-09-21
a guilty plea? Did he ever say if we had this information, I’m not going to enter a guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141858 - 2017-09-21
State v. Van G. Norwood
this letter as an offer of settlement. [Norwood] says I’m willing to plead out to a Class B felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19687 - 2005-10-27
this letter as an offer of settlement. [Norwood] says I’m willing to plead out to a Class B felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19687 - 2005-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts a second time, saying: We know that the defendant broke into Miss Zeman’s home because she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70759 - 2014-09-15
the facts a second time, saying: We know that the defendant broke into Miss Zeman’s home because she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70759 - 2014-09-15
WI App 156 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2393-CR Complete Titl...
, the prosecutor returned to the subject of the missing witness, saying: Finally, even though [Saunders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74074 - 2011-12-13
, the prosecutor returned to the subject of the missing witness, saying: Finally, even though [Saunders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74074 - 2011-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
of the legislative choice or to envision other options. The statute says what it says and we—and the MacHuttas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30987 - 2007-12-18
of the legislative choice or to envision other options. The statute says what it says and we—and the MacHuttas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30987 - 2007-12-18
[PDF]
Brown County Dept. of Human Services v. Dawn M. E.
, and that he told Dawn what to say and when to say it. She also saw that Dawn allowed Daniel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4260 - 2017-09-19
, and that he told Dawn what to say and when to say it. She also saw that Dawn allowed Daniel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4260 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
William Poluk v. J.N. Manson Agency, Inc.
direct examination testimony regarding the contents of the telephone call was: Q: What did you say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4969 - 2017-09-19
direct examination testimony regarding the contents of the telephone call was: Q: What did you say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4969 - 2017-09-19