Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19501 - 19510 of 29740 for des.
Search results 19501 - 19510 of 29740 for des.
State v. John F. Braz
review the ultimate determination of whether counsel was ineffective de novo. See id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2689 - 2005-03-31
review the ultimate determination of whether counsel was ineffective de novo. See id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2689 - 2005-03-31
Joseph Leitinger v. Van Buren Management
presents an issue of law we decide de novo, see Koffman, 246 Wis. 2d 31, ¶20. DISCUSSION ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25661 - 2006-07-25
presents an issue of law we decide de novo, see Koffman, 246 Wis. 2d 31, ¶20. DISCUSSION ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25661 - 2006-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
the context of summary judgment methodology, arguing that we should consider de novo whether there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88840 - 2012-10-31
the context of summary judgment methodology, arguing that we should consider de novo whether there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88840 - 2012-10-31
Lillie M. Jones v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation
reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4206 - 2005-03-31
reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4206 - 2005-03-31
Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
to undisputed facts. We review this question of law de novo. See State ex rel. Blum v. Bd. of Educ., 209 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13278 - 2005-03-31
to undisputed facts. We review this question of law de novo. See State ex rel. Blum v. Bd. of Educ., 209 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13278 - 2005-03-31
Bradley Clark v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
is a question of law which we review de novo. See Stockbridge School Dist. v. DPI, 202 Wis. 2d 214, 219, 550
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17241 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. See Stockbridge School Dist. v. DPI, 202 Wis. 2d 214, 219, 550
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17241 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, the application of constitutional principles to those facts is a question of law which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36686 - 2009-06-03
, the application of constitutional principles to those facts is a question of law which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36686 - 2009-06-03
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Phillips
and statutory standards is a question of law which the appellate court reviews de novo. State v. Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4727 - 2017-09-19
and statutory standards is a question of law which the appellate court reviews de novo. State v. Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4727 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court. Frost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139715 - 2017-09-21
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court. Frost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139715 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 173
the court applied the correct legal standard to the facts, a matter subject to our de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2007-07-24
the court applied the correct legal standard to the facts, a matter subject to our de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2007-07-24