Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19501 - 19510 of 29796 for des.
Search results 19501 - 19510 of 29796 for des.
State v. Willie E. Fleming
” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. As is evident from its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10893 - 2005-03-31
” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. As is evident from its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10893 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randy D. Stafford
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4991 - 2017-09-19
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4991 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
de novo. See State v. Casarez, 2008 WI App 166, ¶9, 314 Wis. 2d 661, 762 N.W.2d 385. When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568238 - 2022-09-20
de novo. See State v. Casarez, 2008 WI App 166, ¶9, 314 Wis. 2d 661, 762 N.W.2d 385. When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568238 - 2022-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Day v. Allstate Indem. Co., 2011 WI 24, ¶25, 332 Wis. 2d 571, 798 N.W.2d 199. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134853 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. Day v. Allstate Indem. Co., 2011 WI 24, ¶25, 332 Wis. 2d 571, 798 N.W.2d 199. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Albert
with Skwierawski were essentially of de minimis significance. But, as noted earlier, neither we nor the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4075 - 2017-09-20
with Skwierawski were essentially of de minimis significance. But, as noted earlier, neither we nor the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4075 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 75
The interpretation of a restrictive covenant is an issue of law, which we review de novo. Zinda v. Krause, 191 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294196 - 2020-12-08
The interpretation of a restrictive covenant is an issue of law, which we review de novo. Zinda v. Krause, 191 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294196 - 2020-12-08
[PDF]
WI APP 67
review de novo a circuit court’s rulings on summary judgment, and apply the governing standards “just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49357 - 2014-09-15
review de novo a circuit court’s rulings on summary judgment, and apply the governing standards “just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49357 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 88
, questions of law we review de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶¶11, 13, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97997 - 2017-09-21
, questions of law we review de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶¶11, 13, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
review is de novo. See State v. Malone, 2004 WI 108, ¶14, 274 Wis. 2d 540, 550, 683 N.W.2d 1, 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32593 - 2014-09-15
review is de novo. See State v. Malone, 2004 WI 108, ¶14, 274 Wis. 2d 540, 550, 683 N.W.2d 1, 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32593 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether such deficient performance was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101743 - 2017-09-21
was deficient and whether such deficient performance was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101743 - 2017-09-21