Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19511 - 19520 of 59285 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 19511 - 19520 of 59285 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. Aristole E. Farmer, Jr.
reject Farmer’s claim in issue five because it is controlled by our decision in State v. Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3459 - 2017-09-20
reject Farmer’s claim in issue five because it is controlled by our decision in State v. Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3459 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claims of error, which we group into three categories. First, he alleges that “[t]he petition must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158312 - 2017-09-21
claims of error, which we group into three categories. First, he alleges that “[t]he petition must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158312 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Clarence E. Hill
for postconviction relief. On appeal, Hill claims that: (1) the trial court imposed an excessive sentence; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8344 - 2017-09-19
for postconviction relief. On appeal, Hill claims that: (1) the trial court imposed an excessive sentence; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8344 - 2017-09-19
State v. Richard P.T.
1997 claiming that Richard was not Brad’s father. Genetic tests eventually confirmed her claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15426 - 2005-03-31
1997 claiming that Richard was not Brad’s father. Genetic tests eventually confirmed her claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15426 - 2005-03-31
James Harris v. Menard, Inc.
on the safe-place claim and improperly gave the jury a spoliation of evidence instruction. Harris cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19424 - 2005-08-24
on the safe-place claim and improperly gave the jury a spoliation of evidence instruction. Harris cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19424 - 2005-08-24
[PDF]
State v. Ricky A. Bright
was ineffective for failing to object. On appeal, however, Bright does not renew these claims. Instead, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15963 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective for failing to object. On appeal, however, Bright does not renew these claims. Instead, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15963 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, because the lump-sum offer failed to separate Michael’s derivative claim from Sandra’s claims. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62364 - 2011-04-04
, because the lump-sum offer failed to separate Michael’s derivative claim from Sandra’s claims. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62364 - 2011-04-04
[PDF]
Aaron T. Rouse v. Theda Clark Medical Center, Inc.
”) filed motions to dismiss, claiming that Rouse failed to file a notice of claim as required by WIS
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26113 - 2017-09-21
”) filed motions to dismiss, claiming that Rouse failed to file a notice of claim as required by WIS
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26113 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] motion without a hearing. Wilson claimed he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121636 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] motion without a hearing. Wilson claimed he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121636 - 2014-09-15
State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
telephonically. The motion for postconviction relief was denied. ¶4 We first address Cottingham’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2005-03-31
telephonically. The motion for postconviction relief was denied. ¶4 We first address Cottingham’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2005-03-31