Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19511 - 19520 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 19511 - 19520 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Ricardo A. Montemayor, Jr.
. § 752.35 (2001-02),[1] because the real controversy was not fully tried. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5878 - 2005-03-31
. § 752.35 (2001-02),[1] because the real controversy was not fully tried. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5878 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
O’Grady had not presented claims that required an evidentiary hearing. The court also appears to have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014857 - 2025-09-25
O’Grady had not presented claims that required an evidentiary hearing. The court also appears to have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014857 - 2025-09-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
, because the lump-sum offer failed to separate Michael’s derivative claim from Sandra’s claims. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62364 - 2014-09-15
, because the lump-sum offer failed to separate Michael’s derivative claim from Sandra’s claims. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62364 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Darryl D. Johnson
postconviction motion. NOS. 96-2697-CR & 96-3459-CR 2 Johnson claims that: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11442 - 2017-09-19
postconviction motion. NOS. 96-2697-CR & 96-3459-CR 2 Johnson claims that: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11442 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. He claimed he would have asserted his right to testify at trial, stating he wanted to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31738 - 2014-09-15
. He claimed he would have asserted his right to testify at trial, stating he wanted to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31738 - 2014-09-15
State v. Clarence E. Hill
his motions for postconviction relief. On appeal, Hill claims that: (1) the trial court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8344 - 2005-03-31
his motions for postconviction relief. On appeal, Hill claims that: (1) the trial court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8344 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
while claiming to be “teaching” them. ¶3 At trial, the State presented extensive testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555655 - 2022-08-16
while claiming to be “teaching” them. ¶3 At trial, the State presented extensive testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555655 - 2022-08-16
CA Blank Order
a sentence modification motion that raised two grounds for relief: (1) a claim that the extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101873 - 2013-09-09
a sentence modification motion that raised two grounds for relief: (1) a claim that the extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101873 - 2013-09-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-serving” Schreiber’s claims that his counsel assured him the State “likely” would seek a concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214653 - 2018-06-27
-serving” Schreiber’s claims that his counsel assured him the State “likely” would seek a concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214653 - 2018-06-27
[PDF]
James Harris v. Menard, Inc.
claim and improperly gave the jury a spoliation of evidence instruction. Harris cross-appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19424 - 2017-09-21
claim and improperly gave the jury a spoliation of evidence instruction. Harris cross-appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19424 - 2017-09-21