Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19511 - 19520 of 58546 for speedy trial.

State v. Paul S. Ineichen
assistance of trial counsel. Ineichen’s appellate issues are limited to his claims of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7629 - 2005-03-31

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Janella R.
from an expert witness. Janella also contends that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6949 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
at trial represents the former’s ineffective assistance and the latter’s prosecutorial misconduct. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34598 - 2008-11-18

[PDF] NOTICE
and the prosecutor’s failure to introduce a particular photograph at trial represents the former’s ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34598 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Ronald Binon v. Great Northern Insurance Company
. At summary judgment, the trial court ruled in the affirmative as to both questions. In a separate ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12193 - 2017-09-21

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Janella R.
from an expert witness. Janella also contends that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6951 - 2005-03-31

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Janella R.
from an expert witness. Janella also contends that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6950 - 2005-03-31

Shanee Y. v. Ronnie J.
claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his motion to open
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6455 - 2005-03-31

State v. Theodore L. Briggs
grounds: the trial court erred as a matter of law by not requiring the State to prove that the value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12087 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Rolando M. Tong
with one of the State’s witnesses.2 We agree with the State that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12964 - 2017-09-21