Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19521 - 19530 of 29740 for des.
Search results 19521 - 19530 of 29740 for des.
State v. Randy D. Stafford
constitutes a new factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4991 - 2005-03-31
constitutes a new factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4991 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Eugene Hafner v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
should be de novo, paying no deference to the commission’s decision, because the case was heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2304 - 2017-09-19
should be de novo, paying no deference to the commission’s decision, because the case was heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2304 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105815 - 2017-09-21
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105815 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the ordinance, which is subject to de novo review. See Town of Rhine v. Bizzell, 2008 WI 76, ¶13, 311 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79849 - 2014-09-15
of the ordinance, which is subject to de novo review. See Town of Rhine v. Bizzell, 2008 WI 76, ¶13, 311 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165564 - 2017-09-21
is sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165564 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
construction. Construction of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27966 - 2007-01-30
construction. Construction of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27966 - 2007-01-30
State v. Everton Taylor
. Mitchell, 167 Wis. 2d 672, 682, 482 N.W.2d 364 (1992), and we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
. Mitchell, 167 Wis. 2d 672, 682, 482 N.W.2d 364 (1992), and we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Terry H. Redmond
). As such, our review is de novo. See id. However, we value and take particular note of the decisions of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12536 - 2017-09-21
). As such, our review is de novo. See id. However, we value and take particular note of the decisions of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12536 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
the court’s findings are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo the legal question of whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795341 - 2024-05-02
the court’s findings are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo the legal question of whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795341 - 2024-05-02
2011 WI APP 66
review de novo. Xerox Corp. v. DOR, 2009 WI App 113, ¶46, 321 Wis. 2d 181, 772 N.W.2d 677, review denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63115 - 2011-05-25
review de novo. Xerox Corp. v. DOR, 2009 WI App 113, ¶46, 321 Wis. 2d 181, 772 N.W.2d 677, review denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63115 - 2011-05-25