Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19531 - 19540 of 52568 for address.
Search results 19531 - 19540 of 52568 for address.
State v. Bobby G. Grant
is applicable to defective guilty pleas. We agree with the State. We first address Grant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14340 - 2005-03-31
is applicable to defective guilty pleas. We agree with the State. We first address Grant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14340 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not address the other prong. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 (1984) (holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239343 - 2019-04-23
not address the other prong. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 (1984) (holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239343 - 2019-04-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
to first address the issue raised in the cross-appeal because if we were to agree with Willinger-Stecker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35652 - 2014-09-15
to first address the issue raised in the cross-appeal because if we were to agree with Willinger-Stecker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35652 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the jury instructions in this case did not cure any prejudice because they did not address Scott’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82546 - 2014-09-15
the jury instructions in this case did not cure any prejudice because they did not address Scott’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82546 - 2014-09-15
State v. Noel Davila
, and a reviewing court need not address both prongs if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5699 - 2005-03-31
, and a reviewing court need not address both prongs if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5699 - 2005-03-31
Jane Hemberger v. Jo Ann Bitzer
this court has not previously addressed the specific issue presented by this case, the United States Supreme
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17172 - 2005-03-31
this court has not previously addressed the specific issue presented by this case, the United States Supreme
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17172 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
not address because they relate to the procedures used for the No. 2009AP2517 8 disciplinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54232 - 2014-09-15
not address because they relate to the procedures used for the No. 2009AP2517 8 disciplinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54232 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Jones
the detective’s conduct under principles similar to those used to address Terry stops. 5 See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18740 - 2017-09-21
the detective’s conduct under principles similar to those used to address Terry stops. 5 See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18740 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. George W. Perkins
concede the two second-degree sexual assault charges are identical in law. We therefore address only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16057 - 2017-09-21
concede the two second-degree sexual assault charges are identical in law. We therefore address only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16057 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Mark S. Lisiecki
), our supreme court, on certification from this court, addressed a comparable issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4800 - 2017-09-20
), our supreme court, on certification from this court, addressed a comparable issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4800 - 2017-09-20