Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19531 - 19540 of 82976 for case search.
Search results 19531 - 19540 of 82976 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient evidence of venue, and therefore he was entitled to dismissal at the close of the City’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33503 - 2008-07-23
sufficient evidence of venue, and therefore he was entitled to dismissal at the close of the City’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33503 - 2008-07-23
[PDF]
State v. Eric T. Scott
order denying him postconviction relief in each circuit court case underlying the appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17894 - 2017-09-21
order denying him postconviction relief in each circuit court case underlying the appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17894 - 2017-09-21
State v. James Gulley
These consolidated cases have a rather complicated procedural history. Both cases stem from the same underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3793 - 2005-03-31
These consolidated cases have a rather complicated procedural history. Both cases stem from the same underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3793 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 28
2008 WI APP 28 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31679 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 28 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31679 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment in this foreclosure action.[1] We conclude Central Bank failed to establish a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98255 - 2013-06-17
judgment in this foreclosure action.[1] We conclude Central Bank failed to establish a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98255 - 2013-06-17
State v. Jeffrey B. Haines
2002 WI App 139 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1311-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3966 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 139 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1311-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3966 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
sufficient evidence of venue, and therefore he was entitled to dismissal at the close of the City’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33503 - 2014-09-15
sufficient evidence of venue, and therefore he was entitled to dismissal at the close of the City’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33503 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶7 On November 13, 2017, when the case was called for the scheduled jury trial, T.C.G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223780 - 2018-10-23
. ¶7 On November 13, 2017, when the case was called for the scheduled jury trial, T.C.G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223780 - 2018-10-23
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. Edward S.
2001 WI App 169 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-1003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2491 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 169 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-1003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2491 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kim A. Dasko
and the State’s burden to prove every element of this case beyond a reasonable doubt. The court then asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4340 - 2005-03-31
and the State’s burden to prove every element of this case beyond a reasonable doubt. The court then asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4340 - 2005-03-31