Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19531 - 19540 of 30191 for de.
Search results 19531 - 19540 of 30191 for de.
August E. Fabyan v. Town of Delafield
statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16190 - 2005-03-31
statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16190 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Day v. Allstate Indem. Co., 2011 WI 24, ¶25, 332 Wis. 2d 571, 798 N.W.2d 199. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134853 - 2015-02-11
review de novo. Day v. Allstate Indem. Co., 2011 WI 24, ¶25, 332 Wis. 2d 571, 798 N.W.2d 199. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134853 - 2015-02-11
State v. Edward Parker
of double jeopardy and due process violations de novo. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11074 - 2005-03-31
of double jeopardy and due process violations de novo. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11074 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter A. Moss
.2d 518 (Ct. App. 1988). We review interpretations of statutes de novo. Id. ¶22 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3160 - 2005-03-31
.2d 518 (Ct. App. 1988). We review interpretations of statutes de novo. Id. ¶22 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3160 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
. Ziebert, 197 Wis. 2d 144, 152, 539 N.W.2d 883 (1995). ¶16 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106062 - 2013-12-26
. Ziebert, 197 Wis. 2d 144, 152, 539 N.W.2d 883 (1995). ¶16 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106062 - 2013-12-26
State v. Scott M. Sterr
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Here, we move directly to the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6121 - 2005-03-31
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Here, we move directly to the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6121 - 2005-03-31
David C. Williams v. City of Lake Geneva
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. State v. Pablo R., 2000 WI App 242, ¶7, 239 Wis. 2d 479
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4123 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. State v. Pablo R., 2000 WI App 242, ¶7, 239 Wis. 2d 479
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4123 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael E.H.
reviews de novo. See Bantz v. Montgomery Estates, Inc., 163 Wis.2d 973, 978, 473 N.W.2d 506, 508 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12323 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See Bantz v. Montgomery Estates, Inc., 163 Wis.2d 973, 978, 473 N.W.2d 506, 508 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12323 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Firstar Bank of Milwaukee, N.A. v. Carl W. Berntsen
court’s order, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13730 - 2014-09-15
court’s order, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13730 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30875 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30875 - 2014-09-15