Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19541 - 19550 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 19541 - 19550 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
telephonically. The motion for postconviction relief was denied. ¶4 We first address Cottingham’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2005-03-31
telephonically. The motion for postconviction relief was denied. ¶4 We first address Cottingham’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. He claimed he would have asserted his right to testify at trial, stating he wanted to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31738 - 2014-09-15
. He claimed he would have asserted his right to testify at trial, stating he wanted to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31738 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that raised two grounds for relief: (1) a claim that the extended supervision portions of two of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101873 - 2017-09-21
that raised two grounds for relief: (1) a claim that the extended supervision portions of two of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101873 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard P.T.
1997 claiming that Richard was not Brad’s father. Genetic tests eventually confirmed her claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15426 - 2005-03-31
1997 claiming that Richard was not Brad’s father. Genetic tests eventually confirmed her claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15426 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Emerson Electric Co. v. Just in Time, Inc.
Just In Time in this action. Just In Time appeals, claiming that the trial court erroneously applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2476 - 2017-09-19
Just In Time in this action. Just In Time appeals, claiming that the trial court erroneously applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2476 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
that Jones was a felon. Therefore, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that there was insufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106016 - 2013-12-19
that Jones was a felon. Therefore, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that there was insufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106016 - 2013-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel claims. This appeal follows. No. 2012AP2498-CR 4 DISCUSSION ¶7 Robinson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99700 - 2014-09-15
of counsel claims. This appeal follows. No. 2012AP2498-CR 4 DISCUSSION ¶7 Robinson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99700 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Clarence E. Hill
for postconviction relief. On appeal, Hill claims that: (1) the trial court imposed an excessive sentence; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8344 - 2017-09-19
for postconviction relief. On appeal, Hill claims that: (1) the trial court imposed an excessive sentence; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8344 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
O’Grady had not presented claims that required an evidentiary hearing. The court also appears to have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014857 - 2025-09-25
O’Grady had not presented claims that required an evidentiary hearing. The court also appears to have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014857 - 2025-09-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and it was stipulated that Jones was a felon. Therefore, there would be no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106016 - 2017-09-21
, and it was stipulated that Jones was a felon. Therefore, there would be no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106016 - 2017-09-21