Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19541 - 19550 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to those facts is a question of law that this court reviews de novo, see State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138491 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488683 - 2022-03-01

[PDF] State v. Dominic D. Robinson
a search or seizure passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12480 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
reviews de novo. Id., ¶15. ¶4 The double jeopardy provision protects against multiple punishments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41391 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Laurie Briggs v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
that this court reviews de novo. See State ex rel. Badke v. Greendale Village Bd., 173 Wis. 2d 553, 569, 494
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15448 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
this prima facie showing is a question of law that we review de novo. See Oneida Cty. DSS v. Therese S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218074 - 2018-08-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a motion is sufficient is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108337 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kenneth W. Pickens
, the ultimate question of whether Pickens' trial counsel was ineffective is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11033 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶¶19, 22. Johnson bears the burden to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33986 - 2014-09-15

Victoria Black v. Metro Title, Inc.
relied upon by the trial court. Since this is de novo review, we do not have to discuss our reasons why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21394 - 2006-03-22