Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19541 - 19550 of 24443 for extending.
Search results 19541 - 19550 of 24443 for extending.
COURT OF APPEALS
’ extended supervision. The sentencing court ordered Sprewell to pay restitution of $165,074.20 to Capital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116633 - 2014-07-07
’ extended supervision. The sentencing court ordered Sprewell to pay restitution of $165,074.20 to Capital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116633 - 2014-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
and stayed sentence of three years’ confinement and four years’ extended supervision. ¶5 Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141601 - 2015-05-12
and stayed sentence of three years’ confinement and four years’ extended supervision. ¶5 Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141601 - 2015-05-12
CA Blank Order
and eight years’ extended supervision. Counsel identifies two potential issues: whether there is any basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121276 - 2014-09-04
and eight years’ extended supervision. Counsel identifies two potential issues: whether there is any basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121276 - 2014-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
frontage. Instead, they used an existing concrete structure that extended into the water as a makeshift
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43131 - 2009-11-04
frontage. Instead, they used an existing concrete structure that extended into the water as a makeshift
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43131 - 2009-11-04
State v. Robert Simmons
of extended supervision.[4] II. Analysis. ¶5 When reviewing a trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7353 - 2005-03-31
of extended supervision.[4] II. Analysis. ¶5 When reviewing a trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7353 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and that there “was basically one offer that was extended to Mr. Melnik even though they were part of two separate documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103339 - 2017-09-21
and that there “was basically one offer that was extended to Mr. Melnik even though they were part of two separate documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103339 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
’ arguments on these extraneous issues extend beyond the scope of our review, we decline to address them. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44488 - 2014-09-15
’ arguments on these extraneous issues extend beyond the scope of our review, we decline to address them. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44488 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James Held
the trial court, we reject this argument. Friedl’s duties under the implied consent law did not extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2617 - 2017-09-19
the trial court, we reject this argument. Friedl’s duties under the implied consent law did not extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2617 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the burden on the enforcing party to prove that the extended duration was intended.” Id. at 194 (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32461 - 2014-09-15
the burden on the enforcing party to prove that the extended duration was intended.” Id. at 194 (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32461 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision. ¶3 In 2014, Koellen filed a motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190531 - 2017-09-21
confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision. ¶3 In 2014, Koellen filed a motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190531 - 2017-09-21