Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19541 - 19550 of 64077 for records/1000.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
properly exercised its sentencing discretion. Upon reviewing the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757216 - 2024-01-30

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032480 - 2025-11-05

[PDF] Robert J. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrange
review by means of certiorari. The record establishes that the parties below agreed they were before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14448 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
this court’s independent review of record, as required by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158101 - 2017-09-21

State v. Karl Julius James
find in the record no evidence of a conflict of interest. C. Prosecutor's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7794 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891839 - 2024-12-19

COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s: past record of criminal offenses; history of undesirable behavior patterns; personality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37585 - 2009-07-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595453 - 2022-11-29

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. After reviewing the Record and counsel’s report, we ordered counsel to file a supplemental no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079617 - 2026-02-18

COURT OF APPEALS
the same finding. Id. We search the record for evidence to support the court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90587 - 2012-12-12