Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19551 - 19560 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 19551 - 19560 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
properly exercised its sentencing discretion. Upon reviewing the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757216 - 2024-01-30
properly exercised its sentencing discretion. Upon reviewing the record, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757216 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262710 - 2020-06-02
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262710 - 2020-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, as long as the evidence permits a reasonable person to make the same finding. Id. We search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90587 - 2014-09-15
, as long as the evidence permits a reasonable person to make the same finding. Id. We search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90587 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this court’s independent review of record, as required by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158101 - 2017-09-21
this court’s independent review of record, as required by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158101 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion. After conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195399 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion. After conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195399 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is included in the appendix to its brief but is not part of the record. We do not consider these facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149183 - 2017-09-21
is included in the appendix to its brief but is not part of the record. We do not consider these facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149183 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul C. Wozny
record to show that Wozny understood the elements of the offenses before he entered his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6468 - 2017-09-19
record to show that Wozny understood the elements of the offenses before he entered his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6468 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gary Klatt
. at 682, 499 N.W.2d at 640. The trial court considered Klatt’s extensive record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11353 - 2005-03-31
. at 682, 499 N.W.2d at 640. The trial court considered Klatt’s extensive record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11353 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
reviewing the records and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004236 - 2025-09-03
reviewing the records and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004236 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986251 - 2025-07-23
upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986251 - 2025-07-23