Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19561 - 19570 of 49819 for our.
Search results 19561 - 19570 of 49819 for our.
State v. Jose Aldazabal
review of our decision, Aldazabal again filed for relief under § 974.06, Stats. The trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11482 - 2005-03-31
review of our decision, Aldazabal again filed for relief under § 974.06, Stats. The trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11482 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
the no-merit report. After our initial review of the no-merit report and record, we issued an order noting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131732 - 2014-12-11
the no-merit report. After our initial review of the no-merit report and record, we issued an order noting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131732 - 2014-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We consolidated the appeals. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131769 - 2017-09-21
. We consolidated the appeals. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131769 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179855 - 2017-09-21
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179855 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are satisfied that the report properly analyzes each of these issues as having no arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585236 - 2022-11-03
are satisfied that the report properly analyzes each of these issues as having no arguable merit. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585236 - 2022-11-03
[PDF]
State v. Duane E. Bolstad
. We do not need to reach Bolstad’s claims regarding the effectiveness of his counsel because our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13524 - 2017-09-21
. We do not need to reach Bolstad’s claims regarding the effectiveness of his counsel because our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13524 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
raises here in at least one prior motion. As we explained in our decision affirming the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134566 - 2015-02-09
raises here in at least one prior motion. As we explained in our decision affirming the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134566 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
. We grant the motion. We have considered the supplemental reply brief during our deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34588 - 2014-09-15
. We grant the motion. We have considered the supplemental reply brief during our deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34588 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91217 - 2014-09-15
of conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91217 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Kloppenburg, JJ. Maurice Fitzpatrick appeals from a domestic abuse injunction. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132092 - 2017-09-21
and Kloppenburg, JJ. Maurice Fitzpatrick appeals from a domestic abuse injunction. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132092 - 2017-09-21