Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19571 - 19580 of 30191 for de.
Search results 19571 - 19580 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
the court’s findings are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo the legal question of whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795341 - 2024-05-02
the court’s findings are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo the legal question of whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795341 - 2024-05-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standard to request a PBT, however, is a question of law we review de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259710 - 2020-05-12
standard to request a PBT, however, is a question of law we review de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259710 - 2020-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶12 The trial court found that after his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88864 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶12 The trial court found that after his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88864 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exists, presents a question of law that we review de novo. Horizon Bank, Nat’l Ass’n v. Marshalls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365760 - 2021-05-11
exists, presents a question of law that we review de novo. Horizon Bank, Nat’l Ass’n v. Marshalls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365760 - 2021-05-11
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84016 - 2012-06-25
performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84016 - 2012-06-25
Joseph Leitinger v. Van Buren Management
presents an issue of law we decide de novo, see Koffman, 246 Wis. 2d 31, ¶20. DISCUSSION ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25661 - 2006-07-25
presents an issue of law we decide de novo, see Koffman, 246 Wis. 2d 31, ¶20. DISCUSSION ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25661 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient reason for failing to bring available claims earlier is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204468 - 2017-12-06
a sufficient reason for failing to bring available claims earlier is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204468 - 2017-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. ¶11 Schmidt contends that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140997 - 2015-04-29
are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. ¶11 Schmidt contends that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140997 - 2015-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
starts the motor and/or leaves it running. We employ a de novo standard of review for jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31105 - 2007-12-11
starts the motor and/or leaves it running. We employ a de novo standard of review for jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31105 - 2007-12-11
Eugene Glinski v. The Pool People of Central Wisconsin, Inc.
a question of law we review de novo. See Bar Code Resources v. Ameritech, Inc., 229 Wis. 2d 287, 291, 599
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2750 - 2005-03-31
a question of law we review de novo. See Bar Code Resources v. Ameritech, Inc., 229 Wis. 2d 287, 291, 599
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2750 - 2005-03-31