Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19581 - 19590 of 30191 for de.
Search results 19581 - 19590 of 30191 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
and earning ability of the defendant’s dependents is on the defendant. (Emphasis added.) We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104165 - 2013-11-12
and earning ability of the defendant’s dependents is on the defendant. (Emphasis added.) We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104165 - 2013-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id., ¶77. ¶18 Our review of a Nelson/Bentley motion is de novo. See Howell, 301 Wis. 2d 350
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49241 - 2010-04-26
. Id., ¶77. ¶18 Our review of a Nelson/Bentley motion is de novo. See Howell, 301 Wis. 2d 350
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49241 - 2010-04-26
State v. Teressa S.
a question of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2501 - 2005-03-31
a question of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2501 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
whether defense counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial de novo.” State v. Tkacz, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194391 - 2017-09-21
whether defense counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial de novo.” State v. Tkacz, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194391 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See id. If the motion raises sufficient material facts which, if true, show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94192 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See id. If the motion raises sufficient material facts which, if true, show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94192 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
establishes the law of the case raises a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Stuart, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106668 - 2017-09-21
establishes the law of the case raises a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Stuart, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106668 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ryan E. Baker
interpretation that we review de novo. In re Commitment of Burris, 2004 WI 91, ¶31, 273 Wis. 2d 294, 682 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7346 - 2017-09-20
interpretation that we review de novo. In re Commitment of Burris, 2004 WI 91, ¶31, 273 Wis. 2d 294, 682 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7346 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Ryan E. Baker
interpretation that we review de novo. In re Commitment of Burris, 2004 WI 91, ¶31, 273 Wis. 2d 294, 682 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7347 - 2017-09-20
interpretation that we review de novo. In re Commitment of Burris, 2004 WI 91, ¶31, 273 Wis. 2d 294, 682 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7347 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Samuel Bonanno v. Lewis Borsellino
.2d 816, 820 (1987). When evidence is documentary, this court may interpret such evidence de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8762 - 2017-09-19
.2d 816, 820 (1987). When evidence is documentary, this court may interpret such evidence de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8762 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard, and then review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140979 - 2017-09-21
findings of historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard, and then review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140979 - 2017-09-21