Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19581 - 19590 of 29823 for des.
Search results 19581 - 19590 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Id. A defendant who seeks resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80608 - 2012-04-09
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Id. A defendant who seeks resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80608 - 2012-04-09
2007 WI APP 173
the court applied the correct legal standard to the facts, a matter subject to our de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2007-07-24
the court applied the correct legal standard to the facts, a matter subject to our de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2007-07-24
State v. Rufus Davis
recognize that a determination that is decisive of a constitutional right is reviewed de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12648 - 2005-03-31
recognize that a determination that is decisive of a constitutional right is reviewed de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12648 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 45
, 236 Wis. 2d 162, 613 N.W.2d 568. We review de novo, however, the circuit court’s application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31434 - 2014-09-15
, 236 Wis. 2d 162, 613 N.W.2d 568. We review de novo, however, the circuit court’s application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31434 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
5 both questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502779 - 2022-04-05
5 both questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502779 - 2022-04-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
that Weidner has not met his burden of proof. We agree. ¶7 We consider de novo whether a defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50110 - 2014-09-15
that Weidner has not met his burden of proof. We agree. ¶7 We consider de novo whether a defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50110 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo, see State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). ¶10 The County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138491 - 2015-03-30
reviews de novo, see State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). ¶10 The County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138491 - 2015-03-30
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110486 - 2014-04-21
was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110486 - 2014-04-21
[PDF]
WI 67
conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29, 248 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29264 - 2014-09-15
conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29, 248 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29264 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State ex rel. Woods v. Morgan, 224 Wis. 2d 534, 537
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31760 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State ex rel. Woods v. Morgan, 224 Wis. 2d 534, 537
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31760 - 2014-09-15