Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19591 - 19600 of 64730 for b's.
Search results 19591 - 19600 of 64730 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56355 - 2010-11-03
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56355 - 2010-11-03
Jennifer Lynn Schaefer v. Anthony Wade Schaefer
(1)(b)5. [1] This is an expedited appeal under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.17. All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6747 - 2005-03-31
(1)(b)5. [1] This is an expedited appeal under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.17. All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6747 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35179 - 2009-01-13
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35179 - 2009-01-13
Russell C. Winchel v. State Bank of Cross Plains
)(b). This statute applies to motions for reconsideration. See Brunson v. Ward, 2001 WI 89, ¶26, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7093 - 2005-03-31
)(b). This statute applies to motions for reconsideration. See Brunson v. Ward, 2001 WI 89, ¶26, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7093 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
in the [circuit] court,” as required by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(b) and (d). While Kottwitz’s brief contains
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17
in the [circuit] court,” as required by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(b) and (d). While Kottwitz’s brief contains
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: GREGORY B. GILL, JR., Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709729 - 2023-10-03
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: GREGORY B. GILL, JR., Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709729 - 2023-10-03
CA Blank Order
.” Sec. 973.155(1)(b). Whether a defendant is entitled to sentence credit under § 973.155 is a question
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141639 - 2015-05-10
.” Sec. 973.155(1)(b). Whether a defendant is entitled to sentence credit under § 973.155 is a question
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141639 - 2015-05-10
Liduvina Stensland v. Warshafsky
. Therefore, the doctrine of judicial estoppel is inapplicable. B. Issue Preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3485 - 2005-03-31
. Therefore, the doctrine of judicial estoppel is inapplicable. B. Issue Preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3485 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, there was no legal basis to require Podell to answer the discovery requests. B. Allowing Boyle to Join Motion. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26615 - 2006-10-02
, there was no legal basis to require Podell to answer the discovery requests. B. Allowing Boyle to Join Motion. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26615 - 2006-10-02
State v. Gregory T. Miller
performance was deficient because counsel did not know that under § 968.29(3)(b), Stats., 1993-94, the tapes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12595 - 2005-03-31
performance was deficient because counsel did not know that under § 968.29(3)(b), Stats., 1993-94, the tapes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12595 - 2005-03-31