Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1961 - 1970 of 12557 for abusive.
Search results 1961 - 1970 of 12557 for abusive.
[PDF]
NOTICE
a substance abuse problem, contradicting his denial of that problem at sentencing. We conclude that Adell’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46255 - 2014-09-15
a substance abuse problem, contradicting his denial of that problem at sentencing. We conclude that Adell’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46255 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that No. 2013AP873-CR 2 his statutory ineligibility for the Substance Abuse Program (SAP) 1 is a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108146 - 2017-09-21
that No. 2013AP873-CR 2 his statutory ineligibility for the Substance Abuse Program (SAP) 1 is a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108146 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the revocation of his probation on a conviction for child abuse—recklessly causing harm. Attorney Ellen Krahn
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208691 - 2018-02-19
the revocation of his probation on a conviction for child abuse—recklessly causing harm. Attorney Ellen Krahn
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208691 - 2018-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that his statutory ineligibility for the Substance Abuse Program (SAP)[1] is a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108146 - 2014-02-18
contends that his statutory ineligibility for the Substance Abuse Program (SAP)[1] is a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108146 - 2014-02-18
State v. Joel N. Nitka
. Joel N. Nitka appeals from a judgment of conviction for physical abuse of a child, contrary to § 948.03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8257 - 2005-03-31
. Joel N. Nitka appeals from a judgment of conviction for physical abuse of a child, contrary to § 948.03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8257 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction, entered upon his guilty pleas, on one count of violating a domestic abuse injunction and one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104336 - 2017-09-21
of conviction, entered upon his guilty pleas, on one count of violating a domestic abuse injunction and one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104336 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of domestic abuse. Preisler was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592962 - 2022-11-22
of domestic abuse. Preisler was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592962 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
State v. Joel N. Nitka
of conviction for physical abuse of a child, contrary to § 948.03(2)(b) and (5), STATS. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8257 - 2017-09-19
of conviction for physical abuse of a child, contrary to § 948.03(2)(b) and (5), STATS. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8257 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of conviction for disorderly conduct with domestic abuse and repeater enhancers. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69104 - 2011-08-08
a judgment of conviction for disorderly conduct with domestic abuse and repeater enhancers. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69104 - 2011-08-08
[PDF]
State v. David W. Oakley
William A. Bablitch withdraws the sixth sentence in paragraph 33 from his concurrence: "He has abused
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17588 - 2017-09-21
William A. Bablitch withdraws the sixth sentence in paragraph 33 from his concurrence: "He has abused
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17588 - 2017-09-21