Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1961 - 1970 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 1961 - 1970 of 83344 for case search.
State v. William R. Junnor
the standard of review applicable in suppression cases: The constitutional validity of a search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19039 - 2005-07-18
the standard of review applicable in suppression cases: The constitutional validity of a search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19039 - 2005-07-18
[PDF]
State v. William R. Junnor
“no.” Washington then asked Junnor if he could check (by conducting a pat-down search). Junnor responded “go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19039 - 2017-09-21
“no.” Washington then asked Junnor if he could check (by conducting a pat-down search). Junnor responded “go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19039 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is whether the police could properly rely upon certain evidence seized during a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205204 - 2017-12-14
is whether the police could properly rely upon certain evidence seized during a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205204 - 2017-12-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deemed an unlawful search and suppressed as evidence. The court later signed a subpoena from the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305386 - 2020-11-17
deemed an unlawful search and suppressed as evidence. The court later signed a subpoena from the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305386 - 2020-11-17
State v. Steven G. Loveday
in not granting his motion to suppress evidence.[1] I. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11407 - 2005-03-31
in not granting his motion to suppress evidence.[1] I. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11407 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was entitled to a Franks/Mann hearing regarding his claim that a search warrant omitted information that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85590 - 2012-07-30
was entitled to a Franks/Mann hearing regarding his claim that a search warrant omitted information that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85590 - 2012-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. He argues he was entitled to a Franks/Mann hearing regarding his claim that a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85590 - 2014-09-15
. He argues he was entitled to a Franks/Mann hearing regarding his claim that a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85590 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of his right to refuse a request that he consent to a search. The court denied that motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27417 - 2014-09-15
of his right to refuse a request that he consent to a search. The court denied that motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27417 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
consent to a search. The court denied that motion without a hearing on the ground that Golden waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27417 - 2006-12-13
consent to a search. The court denied that motion without a hearing on the ground that Golden waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27417 - 2006-12-13
[MS WORD]
JC-1611: Dispositional Order - Protection or Services (Chapter 48)
Resolutoria – Protección o Servicios (Capítulo 48) Case No. Causa No. This form does not replace
/formdisplay/JC-1611_es.doc?formNumber=JC-1611&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=es - 2025-05-20
Resolutoria – Protección o Servicios (Capítulo 48) Case No. Causa No. This form does not replace
/formdisplay/JC-1611_es.doc?formNumber=JC-1611&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=es - 2025-05-20