Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1961 - 1970 of 12464 for mr.
Search results 1961 - 1970 of 12464 for mr.
County of Vilas v. David R. Melstrand
and Poupart did not exceed the scope of the consent. The court stated: Now, in some instances, Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4347 - 2005-03-31
and Poupart did not exceed the scope of the consent. The court stated: Now, in some instances, Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4347 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
placed Mr. Madlock in a “truck,” on 16th Street, in front of [T.M.]’s residence, on October 23, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91562 - 2014-09-15
placed Mr. Madlock in a “truck,” on 16th Street, in front of [T.M.]’s residence, on October 23, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91562 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a Written Explanation of Determinate Sentence. Mr. Williams one of the things I’ve made you eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172920 - 2017-09-21
a Written Explanation of Determinate Sentence. Mr. Williams one of the things I’ve made you eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172920 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was pending. Although there are not indications of drug use, Mr. Byrd only self-reports five or six times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29781 - 2007-07-23
was pending. Although there are not indications of drug use, Mr. Byrd only self-reports five or six times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29781 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
County of Vilas v. David R. Melstrand
: Now, in some instances, Mr. Melstrand may be correct relative to reaching into someone’s pocket
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4347 - 2017-09-19
: Now, in some instances, Mr. Melstrand may be correct relative to reaching into someone’s pocket
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4347 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Thus, the exchange we review is as follows: No. 2012AP520-CR 4 Mr. Smith: See, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91909 - 2014-09-15
. Thus, the exchange we review is as follows: No. 2012AP520-CR 4 Mr. Smith: See, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91909 - 2014-09-15
State v. James C. Smith
that looking at Mr. Smith’s past history which most notably the episode in the—I think it was the supermarket
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6661 - 2005-03-31
that looking at Mr. Smith’s past history which most notably the episode in the—I think it was the supermarket
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6661 - 2005-03-31
State v. Orbbie Williams
]iven the nature and number of Mr. Williams’s previous convictions, given the horrible criminal behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
]iven the nature and number of Mr. Williams’s previous convictions, given the horrible criminal behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
made this statement: THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Herrmann, there is a matter that I’d like to put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107967 - 2017-09-21
made this statement: THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Herrmann, there is a matter that I’d like to put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107967 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
706, 709 (citations omitted). Madlock’s appeal recognizes this: Credible evidence placed Mr. Madlock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91562 - 2013-01-14
706, 709 (citations omitted). Madlock’s appeal recognizes this: Credible evidence placed Mr. Madlock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91562 - 2013-01-14