Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1961 - 1970 of 63579 for records.
Search results 1961 - 1970 of 63579 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Audell Hernandez
. We conclude from our examination of the entire record, including the post-trial motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15395 - 2017-09-21
. We conclude from our examination of the entire record, including the post-trial motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15395 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 31, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
obtained by the Postons against Burns-Barr because we concluded that no evidence in the record supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85608 - 2012-07-30
obtained by the Postons against Burns-Barr because we concluded that no evidence in the record supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85608 - 2012-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
records if he wanted to establish that he did not receive the itemized services on the dates listed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29180 - 2007-05-23
records if he wanted to establish that he did not receive the itemized services on the dates listed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29180 - 2007-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.2 Upon consideration of the report, the response, and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=281765 - 2020-08-27
.2 Upon consideration of the report, the response, and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=281765 - 2020-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
in the record before this court. Additional facts are provided below as necessary. DISCUSSION ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27591 - 2006-12-26
in the record before this court. Additional facts are provided below as necessary. DISCUSSION ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27591 - 2006-12-26
Kathleen S. Vitalis v. Daniel J. Vitalis
the record supports the trial court's exercise of discretion, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11302 - 2005-03-31
the record supports the trial court's exercise of discretion, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11302 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State concedes that the circuit court’s order is not supported by the record, and our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159357 - 2017-09-21
the State concedes that the circuit court’s order is not supported by the record, and our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159357 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s findings, and listening to the audio recording of the police interrogation, that Jones did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138234 - 2015-03-23
the circuit court’s findings, and listening to the audio recording of the police interrogation, that Jones did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138234 - 2015-03-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the Postons against Burns-Barr because we concluded that no evidence in the record supported the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85608 - 2014-09-15
by the Postons against Burns-Barr because we concluded that no evidence in the record supported the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85608 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The record shows that both parties agreed that AJ Petroleum needed to exercise its right to purchase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995091 - 2025-08-12
.” The record shows that both parties agreed that AJ Petroleum needed to exercise its right to purchase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995091 - 2025-08-12