Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1961 - 1970 of 20943 for word.

[PDF] Frontsheet
1 The Honorable Peter L. Grimm presided. 2 There are two different words for the noun form
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207250 - 2018-01-19

League of Women Voters v. Madison Community Foundation
a trust amendment to an administrative provision when that provision, in the words of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19925 - 2005-12-11

State v. Dale Steinbach
conduct, conclude that the officer's conduct or words would be likely to elicit an incriminating response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10716 - 2005-03-31

Steven Theuer v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
is unreasonable.[13] An unreasonable interpretation of a statute is one that "directly contravenes the words
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16377 - 2005-03-31

Betty L. Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
813 (1969). Words or phrases are ambiguous if they may be reasonably interpreted in more than one way
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17225 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 93
this by giving the words in an insurance policy “their common and ordinary meaning, that is, the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155716 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Robert Pasko v. City of Milwaukee
. Kenneth J.Z., 194 Wis. 2d 689, 695, 535 N.W.2d 97 (Ct. App. 1995). In other words, privity compares
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17546 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Betty L. Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
, 170 N.W.2d 813 (1969). Words or phrases are ambiguous if they may be reasonably interpreted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17225 - 2017-09-21

State v. Frederick G. Jackson
sequence. After you read him his rights and asked him if he wanted to make a statement, what exact words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13662 - 2005-03-31

William E. Marberry v. Phillip G. Macht
) (citation omitted). Although use of the word “shall” in a statute suggests that the provision is mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15998 - 2005-03-31