Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19601 - 19610 of 29810 for des.
Search results 19601 - 19610 of 29810 for des.
Roland F. Sarko v. Examining Board of Architects
weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. See UFE Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3892 - 2005-03-31
weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. See UFE Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3892 - 2005-03-31
Pastori M. Balele v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
review de novo, while other factors are matters for the exercise of discretion by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14502 - 2005-03-31
review de novo, while other factors are matters for the exercise of discretion by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14502 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in question requires the interpretation of a statute, which is a question of law reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34126 - 2014-09-15
in question requires the interpretation of a statute, which is a question of law reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34126 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The interpretation of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61779 - 2014-09-15
. The interpretation of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61779 - 2014-09-15
State v. John C. Thorstad
Whether a search is reasonable is a question of constitutional law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15717 - 2005-03-31
Whether a search is reasonable is a question of constitutional law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15717 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 11
). We need not decide the level of deference to apply as even with de novo review, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131960 - 2017-09-21
). We need not decide the level of deference to apply as even with de novo review, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131960 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39, 334 Wis. 2d 335
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160976 - 2017-09-21
, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39, 334 Wis. 2d 335
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160976 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252216 - 2020-01-09
of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252216 - 2020-01-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law, which we review de novo, while accepting the findings of fact made by the trial court unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38501 - 2014-09-15
of law, which we review de novo, while accepting the findings of fact made by the trial court unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38501 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210679 - 2018-04-11
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210679 - 2018-04-11