Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19621 - 19630 of 57912 for a i x.
Search results 19621 - 19630 of 57912 for a i x.
State v. Vincent Angiolo
, 492, 520 N.W.2d 923, 926 (Ct. App. 1994) (Angiolo I).[1] Seeking to apply this reversal retroactively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10228 - 2005-03-31
, 492, 520 N.W.2d 923, 926 (Ct. App. 1994) (Angiolo I).[1] Seeking to apply this reversal retroactively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10228 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dwayne Williams
that observation, reasonably suspect that it contained illegal drugs. [I]n this particular instance, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
that observation, reasonably suspect that it contained illegal drugs. [I]n this particular instance, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
State v. John R. Lootans
that the individual provide a sample. See id. The court also noted that “[i]f the officer proceeds under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31
that the individual provide a sample. See id. The court also noted that “[i]f the officer proceeds under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31
John Doe v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I John Doe 1, Plaintiff-Appellant, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26312 - 2006-08-28
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I John Doe 1, Plaintiff-Appellant, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26312 - 2006-08-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
I). We rejected that argument and affirmed both the judgment of conviction and the order denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294056 - 2020-10-06
I). We rejected that argument and affirmed both the judgment of conviction and the order denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294056 - 2020-10-06
COURT OF APPEALS
obtained from his detention. I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 At approximately 11:30 p.m. on February 16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85468 - 2012-07-25
obtained from his detention. I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 At approximately 11:30 p.m. on February 16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85468 - 2012-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel replied: I think she’s going to testify that she’s never disclosed to her therapist that anyone’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
counsel replied: I think she’s going to testify that she’s never disclosed to her therapist that anyone’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Thomas M.
order, Thomas responded: A. Well, I see there is a need for, right now I’m not home, there is a need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15066 - 2017-09-21
order, Thomas responded: A. Well, I see there is a need for, right now I’m not home, there is a need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15066 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2007AP577-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2005CF5912 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31766 - 2008-02-11
. Appeal No. 2007AP577-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2005CF5912 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31766 - 2008-02-11
Holly R. v. Joseph T.
rights?” Joseph T. answered: “And I don’t want to do that, sir.” The trial court noted that Joseph T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2663 - 2005-03-31
rights?” Joseph T. answered: “And I don’t want to do that, sir.” The trial court noted that Joseph T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2663 - 2005-03-31