Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19621 - 19630 of 70126 for his.
Search results 19621 - 19630 of 70126 for his.
State v. Pablo Cruz Santana
was unduly harsh and excessive based on his minimal prior record, and the trial court misused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12747 - 2005-03-31
was unduly harsh and excessive based on his minimal prior record, and the trial court misused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12747 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Pablo Cruz Santana
-2048-CR 2 enhanced sentence was unduly harsh and excessive based on his minimal prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12747 - 2017-09-21
-2048-CR 2 enhanced sentence was unduly harsh and excessive based on his minimal prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12747 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Alswager disputed the fees and costs claimed by Lawton, arguing that his attorney at Lawton, Lisa Goldman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76794 - 2012-01-18
. Alswager disputed the fees and costs claimed by Lawton, arguing that his attorney at Lawton, Lisa Goldman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76794 - 2012-01-18
[PDF]
State v. Mervel L. Eagans, Jr.
finding him to be a sexually violent person under ch. 980, STATS., and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13790 - 2014-09-15
finding him to be a sexually violent person under ch. 980, STATS., and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13790 - 2014-09-15
State v. David E. Verhagen
. On appeal, Verhagen contends that: (1) the statutory scheme violates his equal protection rights, (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8205 - 2005-03-31
. On appeal, Verhagen contends that: (1) the statutory scheme violates his equal protection rights, (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8205 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his postconviction motion. We affirm. ¶2 The charge in this case was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463213 - 2021-12-16
and an order denying his postconviction motion. We affirm. ¶2 The charge in this case was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463213 - 2021-12-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief.1 Stryker argues the circuit court erroneously denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467290 - 2021-12-29
denying his motion for postconviction relief.1 Stryker argues the circuit court erroneously denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467290 - 2021-12-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, J. 1 B.S. appeals orders in two cases that were tried together that involuntarily terminate his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217549 - 2018-08-08
, J. 1 B.S. appeals orders in two cases that were tried together that involuntarily terminate his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217549 - 2018-08-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for dismissal of the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243789 - 2019-07-16
.1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for dismissal of the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243789 - 2019-07-16
[PDF]
WI APP 189
and Nettesheim, JJ. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. After the trial court denied his motion to suppress, Pedro L. Nieves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29289 - 2014-09-15
and Nettesheim, JJ. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. After the trial court denied his motion to suppress, Pedro L. Nieves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29289 - 2014-09-15