Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19631 - 19640 of 30191 for de.
Search results 19631 - 19640 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J. H.
and that this deficient performance prejudiced his defense.” Id. This presents a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6181 - 2017-09-19
and that this deficient performance prejudiced his defense.” Id. This presents a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6181 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 54
review de novo.” Id. (emphasis added). Applying that standard of review, we conclude that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81087 - 2014-09-15
review de novo.” Id. (emphasis added). Applying that standard of review, we conclude that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81087 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112978 - 2017-09-21
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112978 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
5 both questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502779 - 2022-04-05
5 both questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502779 - 2022-04-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law de novo. State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31, ¶8, 299 Wis. 2d 251, 258, 729 N.W.2d 784, 788
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88418 - 2014-09-15
of law de novo. State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31, ¶8, 299 Wis. 2d 251, 258, 729 N.W.2d 784, 788
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88418 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 138
will review the application of constitutional principles to the facts de novo. Id. ¶6 Officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33728 - 2014-09-15
will review the application of constitutional principles to the facts de novo. Id. ¶6 Officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33728 - 2014-09-15
Waukesha County v. Steven H.
is a question of law we review de novo, see id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. Further, whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14674 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo, see id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. Further, whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14674 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 220
. Stat. § 807.01 to the facts presented, we employ a de novo standard of review. See Ritt v. Dental Care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26524 - 2006-10-30
. Stat. § 807.01 to the facts presented, we employ a de novo standard of review. See Ritt v. Dental Care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26524 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and application present questions of law that we review de novo while benefiting from the analys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208336 - 2018-02-15
and application present questions of law that we review de novo while benefiting from the analys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208336 - 2018-02-15
Gerardo Machado v. Shallbetter, Inc.
, which is subject to de novo review. See Northern States Power Co. v. National Gas Co., Inc., 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25893 - 2006-07-18
, which is subject to de novo review. See Northern States Power Co. v. National Gas Co., Inc., 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25893 - 2006-07-18