Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19631 - 19640 of 29740 for des.
Search results 19631 - 19640 of 29740 for des.
State v. Peter J. Pronold
, rather than reviewing the matter de novo. See id. ¶4 We are confined to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14935 - 2005-03-31
, rather than reviewing the matter de novo. See id. ¶4 We are confined to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14935 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Krier v. Vilione, 2009 WI 45, ¶14, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76955 - 2012-01-24
We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Krier v. Vilione, 2009 WI 45, ¶14, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76955 - 2012-01-24
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment is well known. We review the circuit court’s summary judgment decision de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101280 - 2013-08-26
judgment is well known. We review the circuit court’s summary judgment decision de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101280 - 2013-08-26
State v. Roosevelt Bennett, Jr.
.2d 752 (1990). The appellate court will not apply a de novo review, but rather will consider whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4080 - 2005-03-31
.2d 752 (1990). The appellate court will not apply a de novo review, but rather will consider whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4080 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
performance was deficient and whether the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877016 - 2024-11-19
performance was deficient and whether the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877016 - 2024-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Id. Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35015 - 2008-12-29
erroneous. Id. Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35015 - 2008-12-29
COURT OF APPEALS
findings is reviewed de novo. See id., 2008 WI App 166, ¶9, 314 Wis. 2d at 668, 762 N.W.2d at 388–389
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127139 - 2014-11-11
findings is reviewed de novo. See id., 2008 WI App 166, ¶9, 314 Wis. 2d at 668, 762 N.W.2d at 388–389
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127139 - 2014-11-11
2009 WI APP 181
” makes the contingency indefinite and renders the contract illusory. ¶7 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43921 - 2011-02-07
” makes the contingency indefinite and renders the contract illusory. ¶7 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43921 - 2011-02-07
State v. Lawrence J. Fields
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2383 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2383 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
representation is not required.” Id. There is no “de minimus disparity [that] amounts to an unfair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947326 - 2025-04-30
representation is not required.” Id. There is no “de minimus disparity [that] amounts to an unfair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947326 - 2025-04-30