Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19641 - 19650 of 29821 for des.
Search results 19641 - 19650 of 29821 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id., ¶¶19, 22. Johnson bears the burden to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33986 - 2008-09-10
de novo. Id., ¶¶19, 22. Johnson bears the burden to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33986 - 2008-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
questions of law de novo. See Pawlowski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2009 WI 105, ¶16, 322 Wis. 2d 21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63283 - 2011-04-27
questions of law de novo. See Pawlowski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2009 WI 105, ¶16, 322 Wis. 2d 21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63283 - 2011-04-27
[PDF]
Acute Care Associates v. Trinity Memorial Hospital of Cudahy, Inc.
standards as the trial court. See id. Our review is de novo. See id. We will affirm the summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12886 - 2017-09-21
standards as the trial court. See id. Our review is de novo. See id. We will affirm the summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12886 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 750 N.W.2d 42. The State does not dispute this assertion. We review questions of law de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62515 - 2014-09-15
, 750 N.W.2d 42. The State does not dispute this assertion. We review questions of law de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62515 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City of Madison, 190 Wis. 2d 585, 591-92, 527 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17017 - 2017-09-21
that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City of Madison, 190 Wis. 2d 585, 591-92, 527 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
whether defense counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial de novo.” State v. Tkacz, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194391 - 2017-09-21
whether defense counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial de novo.” State v. Tkacz, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194391 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Cheryl Ellerman v. City of Manitowoc
under summary judgment submissions presents a question of law subject to de novo review. Henderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6134 - 2017-09-19
under summary judgment submissions presents a question of law subject to de novo review. Henderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6134 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Kreutz
and application of the statute to undisputed facts and our review is de novo. See Gonzalez v. Teskey, 160 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8595 - 2017-09-19
and application of the statute to undisputed facts and our review is de novo. See Gonzalez v. Teskey, 160 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8595 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Village of Egg Harbor v. Sarkis, 166 Wis. 2d 5, 10, 479 N.W.2d 536 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249658 - 2019-11-05
of law that we review de novo. Village of Egg Harbor v. Sarkis, 166 Wis. 2d 5, 10, 479 N.W.2d 536 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249658 - 2019-11-05
[PDF]
Duane v. Town of Menasha
the Appeals Board’s decision, we examine the record de novo without deference to the opinion of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10151 - 2017-09-19
the Appeals Board’s decision, we examine the record de novo without deference to the opinion of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10151 - 2017-09-19