Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19641 - 19650 of 29740 for des.
Search results 19641 - 19650 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488683 - 2022-03-01
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488683 - 2022-03-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in their entirety with prejudice. Wimberger appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171379 - 2017-09-21
in their entirety with prejudice. Wimberger appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to No. 2015AP800 4 review the record de novo and to substitute its judgment for that of the municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161687 - 2017-09-21
to No. 2015AP800 4 review the record de novo and to substitute its judgment for that of the municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161687 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
/Bentley motion is de novo. See Howell, 301 Wis. 2d 350, ¶78. We determine as a matter of law “whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49241 - 2014-09-15
/Bentley motion is de novo. See Howell, 301 Wis. 2d 350, ¶78. We determine as a matter of law “whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49241 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this decision. No. 2017AP1041 4 DISCUSSION ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224814 - 2018-10-30
this decision. No. 2017AP1041 4 DISCUSSION ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224814 - 2018-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion is sufficient is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108337 - 2017-09-21
a motion is sufficient is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108337 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Raymond B. Keller v. Thomas J. Morfeld
was divided” in 1977. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13313 - 2017-09-21
was divided” in 1977. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13313 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
erroneous but will review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342084 - 2021-03-02
erroneous but will review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342084 - 2021-03-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The determination of counsel’s effectiveness is a question of law, which we review de novo. Kimbrough, 246 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191100 - 2017-09-21
. The determination of counsel’s effectiveness is a question of law, which we review de novo. Kimbrough, 246 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191100 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Molly K. Borreson v. Craig J. Yunto
concerns the interpretation of a statute, a question of law we review de novo. Village of Cross Plains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24570 - 2017-09-21
concerns the interpretation of a statute, a question of law we review de novo. Village of Cross Plains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24570 - 2017-09-21