Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19651 - 19660 of 66042 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 19651 - 19660 of 66042 for motion to dismiss.
CA Blank Order
; Moore would be free to argue. Also, the felon-in-possession charge would be dismissed and read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95944 - 2013-04-22
; Moore would be free to argue. Also, the felon-in-possession charge would be dismissed and read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95944 - 2013-04-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. McConochie argues a condition 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258444 - 2020-04-22
motion. McConochie argues a condition 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258444 - 2020-04-22
[PDF]
State v. Bryan Gary
and an order denying his motion to withdraw his plea. Gary argues: (1) his plea was unknowing because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19309 - 2017-09-21
and an order denying his motion to withdraw his plea. Gary argues: (1) his plea was unknowing because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19309 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
charge would be dismissed and read in at sentencing. Ultimately, the circuit court sentenced Moore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95944 - 2014-09-15
charge would be dismissed and read in at sentencing. Ultimately, the circuit court sentenced Moore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95944 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2024AP2538-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Following the circuit court’s denial of his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045069 - 2025-12-03
). No. 2024AP2538-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Following the circuit court’s denial of his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045069 - 2025-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
motion.[1] The issues are whether the trial court imposed an unduly harsh sentence, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35637 - 2009-02-23
motion.[1] The issues are whether the trial court imposed an unduly harsh sentence, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35637 - 2009-02-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. He also appeals the order denying his motion for sentence modification.1 Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
. He also appeals the order denying his motion for sentence modification.1 Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
State v. David E. Bowers
. § 948.02(1).[1] Bowers also appeals from the order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4310 - 2005-03-31
. § 948.02(1).[1] Bowers also appeals from the order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4310 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
his postconviction motion in which he argues that his sentence should be vacated and he should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13217 - 2017-09-21
his postconviction motion in which he argues that his sentence should be vacated and he should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13217 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a plea bargain pursuant to which he pled guilty to the latter charge, and the State dismissed and read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806858 - 2024-05-29
a plea bargain pursuant to which he pled guilty to the latter charge, and the State dismissed and read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806858 - 2024-05-29