Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19651 - 19660 of 44402 for name change.

[PDF] Racine Education Association v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
the examiner’s finding that “the change to a year-round school calendar had a direct and substantial impact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12030 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
changes of the facet joint at L4-L5” and “[m]ultilevel degenerative disk disease … with congenital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177596 - 2017-09-21

Peggy Sue Podolak v. John Peter Podolak
significant changes in his work schedule should he receive primary placement so that he could spend more time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6283 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] A.B. Schmitz Agency, Inc. v. Edward Wendel
that it could be changed or added to by mutual agreement. The parties acknowledged their understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9096 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the possibility that foreclosure might be appropriate going forward if there were changed circumstances since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182187 - 2017-09-21

State v. Sean Fitzgerald Rowell
was unable to identify anyone, but he changed his answer and wrote “number 4” (Rowell’s number) on his card
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14006 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kevin C. Spinks
, and Spinks’s ultimate decision not to testify would not have changed. We agree. ¶16 The trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18386 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jamie M. Grosse
on the grounds that the prison administrative sanction there led only to a change in the conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11116 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” happened, or why the details of her accusations changed so greatly when she shifted the blame from Woller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243054 - 2019-07-02

COURT OF APPEALS
, for a new trial. The circuit court construed this to be a request to change the jury’s verdict on causation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36412 - 2005-03-31