Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19661 - 19670 of 58951 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] State v. Michael Schulteis
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4102 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Fitzroy Donaldson
for a number of reasons. He claims that his counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain certain police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13410 - 2017-09-21

Housing Partnership Corporation v. Ms. Renee Miller
, and that their interests as tenants would not be impaired by the disposition of the foreclosure action. The Members claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12190 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 143
. No. 2009AP2810 2 Westfield claims that because the house was still owned by Fontana—the general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54668 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 70
. Pursuant to a binding arbitration agreement, Sands asserted claims to a three-person arbitration panel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36138 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
relief.[1] Beal argues that the postconviction court erred when it denied, without a hearing, his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135532 - 2015-02-23

State v. David J. Baertschi
the judgment of conviction and requesting a new trial based upon claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15607 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
raised this claim previously—but asserted that he did so “inadequately.” ¶5 The postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10

State v. Fitzroy Donaldson
that his defense counsel was ineffective for a number of reasons. He claims that his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13410 - 2005-03-31

Michael F. Mullen v. Cedar River Lumber Company
appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his negligence claim against Cedar River Lumber Company
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3284 - 2005-03-31