Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19671 - 19680 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 19671 - 19680 of 84312 for case number.
[PDF]
NOTICE
a concealed weapon—from Racine county case number 07CM988 were dismissed and read in for sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52620 - 2014-09-15
a concealed weapon—from Racine county case number 07CM988 were dismissed and read in for sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52620 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CJT & L, Inc. v. Daryl A. Larson
additur and a new trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21162 - 2017-09-21
additur and a new trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21162 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises from a home invasion by ejected partygoers. James, Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52620 - 2010-07-27
. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises from a home invasion by ejected partygoers. James, Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52620 - 2010-07-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221237 - 2018-11-16
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221237 - 2018-11-16
[PDF]
State v. Donald A. Bratrud
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 95-3402-CR Complete Title of Case:STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10082 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 95-3402-CR Complete Title of Case:STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10082 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, reasonably warrant’ the intrusion of the stop.” Id., ¶27 (quoted source omitted). ¶9 Turning to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162969 - 2017-09-21
, reasonably warrant’ the intrusion of the stop.” Id., ¶27 (quoted source omitted). ¶9 Turning to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162969 - 2017-09-21
Kevin Radman v. Darlene Gustafson
of a five-year time limit. She offered the testimony of a number of witnesses who overheard discussions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4225 - 2005-03-31
of a five-year time limit. She offered the testimony of a number of witnesses who overheard discussions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4225 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gregory C. Royal v. Sara Seehafer
in this case arose out of an encounter between the appellant and Sara Seehafer when they were living next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3203 - 2017-09-19
in this case arose out of an encounter between the appellant and Sara Seehafer when they were living next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3203 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
was the wife, she replied “no.” She gave a description of the vehicle, the license plate number and her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28500 - 2014-09-15
was the wife, she replied “no.” She gave a description of the vehicle, the license plate number and her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28500 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
specially assessed. The precise number is irrelevant to our analysis. No. 2010AP1227 3 ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60862 - 2014-09-15
specially assessed. The precise number is irrelevant to our analysis. No. 2010AP1227 3 ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60862 - 2014-09-15