Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19671 - 19680 of 36277 for e's.
Search results 19671 - 19680 of 36277 for e's.
COURT OF APPEALS
because (1) it “[e]quat[ed] sexual assault with homicide for purposes of sentencing” and (2) it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133580 - 2015-01-27
because (1) it “[e]quat[ed] sexual assault with homicide for purposes of sentencing” and (2) it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133580 - 2015-01-27
State v. Andre Bolden
), it could not do so: “[W]e conclude that the constitution and statutes must be read to provide that only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5858 - 2005-03-31
), it could not do so: “[W]e conclude that the constitution and statutes must be read to provide that only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5858 - 2005-03-31
Anita J. Zeihen v. Leonard L. Loeb
-Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: bruce e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5286 - 2005-03-31
-Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: bruce e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5286 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2011-12). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110887 - 2017-09-21
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2011-12). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110887 - 2017-09-21
State v. Paul R. Benzel
: On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13346 - 2005-03-31
: On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13346 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
finding under WIS. STAT. § 62.23(7)(e)10? This section allows the court on review to hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33851 - 2014-09-15
finding under WIS. STAT. § 62.23(7)(e)10? This section allows the court on review to hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33851 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joshua J. Alderman
the negotiations by saying, “[e]ssentially the state is giving you no deal.” ¶4 Alderman also argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21
the negotiations by saying, “[e]ssentially the state is giving you no deal.” ¶4 Alderman also argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment of the circuit court for Iowa County: EDWARD E. LEINEWEBER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93300 - 2014-09-15
from a judgment of the circuit court for Iowa County: EDWARD E. LEINEWEBER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93300 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Dennis Eborka 620 E. 2nd Street Flint, MI 48503 You are hereby notified that the Court has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901291 - 2025-01-22
Dennis Eborka 620 E. 2nd Street Flint, MI 48503 You are hereby notified that the Court has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901291 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
State v. James D. Curtis
for trial on August 14, 1995. At the time he entered his plea, Curtis was informed the Hon. Lee E. Wells
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11094 - 2017-09-19
for trial on August 14, 1995. At the time he entered his plea, Curtis was informed the Hon. Lee E. Wells
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11094 - 2017-09-19