Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19681 - 19690 of 29817 for des.
Search results 19681 - 19690 of 29817 for des.
State v. William L. Morford
a question of law that we review de novo. See Williams, 2001 WI App 155 at ¶9. However, a motion for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. See Williams, 2001 WI App 155 at ¶9. However, a motion for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31
Jessica Perra v. Menomonee Mutual Insurance Company
and administrative rule interpretation. A question of statutory interpretation we review de novo. See id. at 502
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2171 - 2005-03-31
and administrative rule interpretation. A question of statutory interpretation we review de novo. See id. at 502
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2171 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶12 The trial court found that after his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88864 - 2012-10-31
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶12 The trial court found that after his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88864 - 2012-10-31
[PDF]
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City of Madison, 190 Wis. 2d 585, 591-92, 527 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16969 - 2017-09-21
that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City of Madison, 190 Wis. 2d 585, 591-92, 527 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16969 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sean M. Daley
interpretation question, which we review de novo. See State v. DeLain, 2005 WI 52, ¶11, 280 Wis. 2d 51, 695
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24775 - 2017-09-21
interpretation question, which we review de novo. See State v. DeLain, 2005 WI 52, ¶11, 280 Wis. 2d 51, 695
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24775 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court’s exercise of discretion, we decide the issue de novo. Id., ¶19. Substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114810 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court’s exercise of discretion, we decide the issue de novo. Id., ¶19. Substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114810 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de novo.” Id. ¶8 The parties agree that WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36323 - 2014-09-15
an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de novo.” Id. ¶8 The parties agree that WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36323 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. State v. Aufderhaar, 2005 WI 108, ¶10, 283 Wis. 2d 336, 700 N.W.2d 4. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213523 - 2018-05-30
of law we review de novo. State v. Aufderhaar, 2005 WI 108, ¶10, 283 Wis. 2d 336, 700 N.W.2d 4. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213523 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
Anthony L. Alsum v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Martin J. De Vries of Sager, Colwin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6915 - 2017-09-20
of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Martin J. De Vries of Sager, Colwin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6915 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to found facts is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717185 - 2023-10-19
to found facts is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717185 - 2023-10-19