Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19681 - 19690 of 69002 for he.
Search results 19681 - 19690 of 69002 for he.
CA Blank Order
, set aside, or correct his sentence. In it, he claimed that he was denied the right to be sentenced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112904 - 2014-05-27
, set aside, or correct his sentence. In it, he claimed that he was denied the right to be sentenced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112904 - 2014-05-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
(“Alexander II”). ¶5 Nine months after he filed his second sentence modification motion, he filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28150 - 2014-09-15
(“Alexander II”). ¶5 Nine months after he filed his second sentence modification motion, he filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28150 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Calvin T. Morrison
Morrison appeals a judgment convicting him of aggravated battery. He argues that the State presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13240 - 2017-09-21
Morrison appeals a judgment convicting him of aggravated battery. He argues that the State presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13240 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth Neu
and the officer: Q. Did you ask the defendant or did the defendant indicate to you whether or not he had any eye
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16044 - 2005-03-31
and the officer: Q. Did you ask the defendant or did the defendant indicate to you whether or not he had any eye
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16044 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig A. Coleman
, but that he was eligible for ERP. The PSI recommended four to five years’ confinement followed by three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26206 - 2006-08-14
, but that he was eligible for ERP. The PSI recommended four to five years’ confinement followed by three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26206 - 2006-08-14
State v. Michael Alan Williams
. He argues that the circuit court erred when it concluded that his claims were barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18076 - 2007-12-03
. He argues that the circuit court erred when it concluded that his claims were barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18076 - 2007-12-03
CA Blank Order
under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14).[1] He argues that: (1) his trial counsel was constitutionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143720 - 2015-06-25
under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14).[1] He argues that: (1) his trial counsel was constitutionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143720 - 2015-06-25
CA Blank Order
that he entered them without a full understanding of the rights he was waiving or the consequences
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110284 - 2014-04-15
that he entered them without a full understanding of the rights he was waiving or the consequences
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110284 - 2014-04-15
CA Blank Order
(1967). Radencich was informed of his right to file a response, but he has not done so. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136732 - 2005-03-31
(1967). Radencich was informed of his right to file a response, but he has not done so. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136732 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael D. Thompson
that he had not validly waived his right to counsel in that case. We agree, and therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7326 - 2005-03-31
that he had not validly waived his right to counsel in that case. We agree, and therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7326 - 2005-03-31